Preserving Value Distress Officeholder Powers Cross Border Recovery

Restructuring

February 17, 2026

Preserving Value in Distress: Officeholder Powers and Cross-Border Recovery

By Rob Armstong and Michael Byrne

Insolvency and restructuring practices across the Middle East are developing rapidly. Trustees in the region are increasingly called upon to preserve and recover value in distressed businesses, often under close court supervision. At the same time, comparisons with established regimes, such as the UK, illustrate how different legal frameworks influence outcomes. In cross-border cases, where assets can dissipate quickly, understanding these distinctions is essential for effective value preservation, recovery, and enforcement.

 

Contrasting Officeholder Powers in the Middle East and the UK

Bankruptcy laws in Saudi Arabia and the UAE adopt a debtor-in-possession model during restructuring procedures. In processes such as Preventative Settlement or Financial Restructuring in KSA, and Preventative Settlement or Restructuring in the UAE, management remains in control while trustees take on a supervisory role. Full control shifts to trustees only when liquidation or bankruptcy begins, and even then, major asset disposals typically require court approval. The structure emphasizes judicial oversight, procedural discipline, and stakeholder protection.

By contrast, the UK framework enables the early appointment of administrators, who immediately assume managerial authority. Directors’ powers fall away and administrators can take control of assets, accounts, and operations at speed. Asset disposals are generally flexible and do not require court consent, enabling quick sales or pre-pack transactions. The UK system prioritizes commercial agility, whereas the Middle Eastern approach places greater weight on judicial supervision.

 

Powers in Practice

The real test of officeholder authority comes when value is eroding. In the UK, administrators and liquidators typically act autonomously: they can investigate, preserve assets, and execute decisions quickly. This speed can be decisive when assets or data are at risk.

In Saudi Arabia and the UAE, trustees exercise their powers through a collaborative, court-driven process. Their role centers on gathering evidence, framing requests, and presenting them to the court. Effectiveness therefore depends on strong documentation, persuasive reasoning, and coordinated engagement with stakeholders. This naturally introduces longer timelines and procedural steps, which can influence how quickly value is stabilized or recovered. For creditors, these differences can affect the pace of distributions and the ability to prevent asset leakage at an early stage.

 

Investigations and Clawbacks

Both jurisdictions give officeholders tools to investigate antecedent transactions and pursue reversals. UK officeholders can compel information, conduct examinations, and bring direct applications to unwind wrongful transfers. Their autonomy allows them to progress investigations quickly.

In the Middle East, trustees also investigate preferences, undervalue transactions, and fraudulent conduct, but applications typically require judicial approval. Trustees build the evidential foundation, and the court determines the appropriate remedy. The approach is more structured and court-led, but still allows for robust scrutiny where evidence is strong.

 

Cross-Border Asset Tracing and Recognition

Cross-border insolvency presents additional challenges for officeholders, as assets can move quickly and legal remedies vary significantly between jurisdictions. Recognition is often the critical gateway, enabling access to disclosure orders, freezing measures, and cooperation from foreign courts. Where the UNCITRAL Model Law applies, such as in Saudi Arabia and within the UAE’s financial free zones (ADGM and DIFC), the recognition process is far more streamlined. Where it does not, as in onshore UAE, recognition can be more complex, though foreign insolvency orders may still be recognized under domestic UAE law.

Effective strategies start with early global asset mapping, leveraging open-source intelligence, registries, and forensic tools to identify offshore entities, trust structures, digital assets, bank accounts, and more. Swift protective action is then required, securing recognition in priority jurisdictions and obtaining freezing or disclosure orders before assets can dissipate. Coordinated international investigations then trace fund flows and build the foundation for clawback or enforcement actions. For Middle Eastern trustees, aligning domestic procedures with foreign recognition processes is essential to safeguarding assets and maximizing recoveries.

 

Alternative Strategies

Director appointments or board-level interventions can offer flexible alternatives when formal recognition is slow or uncertain. Combining court-appointed roles with these mechanisms allows practitioners to assert control, protect assets, and gain access to information. Adaptability is particularly important in the Middle East, where judicial involvement influences timing; such interventions are promising but not yet fully matured as tools of practice. They can be highly effective, but only when deployed with caution, experience, and a clear understanding of their limitations.

 

Strategic Asset Recovery Process

At Kroll, we apply a structured asset recovery framework that provides a clear roadmap for navigating the complex process of locating and recovering lost or concealed assets. Each phase is purpose‑built to ensure our approach remains both systematic and adaptable to the unique challenges of every case, as outlined below:

  • Asset Mapping: Build an immediate understanding of assets, structures, and control points across all jurisdictions using deep investigative research, local insight and global networks.
  • Enforcement and Investigations: Develop targeted approaches to locate and secure assets, supporting judgment enforcement and legal actions with precision.
  • Secure Control: Our professionals serve as Receivers, Trustees, and Liquidators, applying statutory powers to gain asset control and maximize outcomes.
  • Asset Realizations: Using insolvency tools and legal mechanisms, we extract critical data to support claims and realizations, ensuring efficient, cost-effective asset monetization and recovery.

For more information, please connect with our experts below.

Stay Ahead with Kroll

Restructuring

Restructuring expertise that maximizes value and recovery

Asset Recovery and Investigations

Recovering misappropriated assets through intelligence and enforcement.

Business Transformation

Accelerating value through readiness and performance-led transformation.